QUOTE (mhoward @ Apr 10 2011, 11:56 AM)
... Yes; if there was anything interesting to see in the "dark terrain", it was too subtle at least for me to pick out. Oh well... onward!
QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Apr 10 2011, 02:09 PM)
... Not much obvious to see, but the surface was noticeably rougher. Elsewhere we had the extremely smooth surface with tiny ripples, as at Eagle crater. Here we had a generally rougher surface, and to me it looked as if a layer about 10 or 20 cm thick had been eroded away to reveal it. It would be interesting to map the distribution of the darker patches all around this area, to see it the distribution offers clues to its origin. ...
It was pretty subtle, alright. Honestly, I was expecting it to be significantly more exciting. I'd have to agree with Phil regarding the surface appearing to be rougher. I was pretty much perplexed until it occurred to me that this dark terrain may simply be a large exposure of the Halfpipe formation. Some of us geologizers had previously started a thread devoted to the Halfpipe formation, where
it was revealed that the name was informally applied to certain dark patches of coarse material overlying bedrock.
I think one of the best exposures of the "formation" was observed on sols 707-717 as shown in
the image I posted almost 5 years ago in the Halfpipe thread. See also,
this comment. This is just another reminder about how much fun it has been to do armchair planetary geology through the rover's eyes.