QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Mar 5 2023, 03:53 PM)
![*](http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/style_images/ip.boardpr/post_snapback.gif)
This is a circular pan made from Steve's cylindrical panorama for sol 718 (Steve's date, but Paul called it the mid-point of sol 719, and the JPL map says 718 but puts it in the middle of the 719 drive when you check the distances). I personally think Paul is correct but can't be certain.
Why take mid-point images? The drive was 415 m long, which is a record distance for a single drive. The images may be a chance to check the navigation data for the drive.
I did use one of Paul's original images to patch a bit of the panorama where the horizon was offset.
Phil
Phil,
I've had a look at this and I'm not 100% sure, but I / we could be getting confused by image sets being acquired the day after the actual drive, and possibly a double entry in JSON & GeoJSON.
Using the Map, JSON URL and the site/drive data on the images, I observe the following:-
There was a reported drive of 216 meters on Sol 717, that drive ended at site 34/2098, but no end-of-drive tiled-NavCams were acquired on that sol. The tiled NavCams for site 34/2098 were only acquired around noon the next sol (Sol 718)
There was a reported drive of 207 meters on Sol 718 , that drive ended at site 34/3196, but no end-of-drive tiled NavCams were acquired on that sol. The tiled NavCams for site 34/3196 were only acquired around 11am the next sol (Sol 719)
There was a reported drive of 415 meters on Sol 719, that drive ended at 34/4394, tiled-NavCams were acquired.
So we had 2 sets of NavCams acquired on Sol 719: 34/3196 & 34/4394
Checking the map & JSON, I think there could be an error that may have initiated by a multisol drive.
The point-to-point distance between map markers for 717 to 718 is ~196m, the p-t-p between 718 to 719 is ~210m, not the >415 meters in JSON and GeoJSON.
One possible explanation is the drives on 718 and 719 may have been executed as a multisol drive. If the drive on sol 718 was to be readjusted to 0 meters in JSON and GeoJSON, and the drive for Sol 719 remained at 415m it could work.
It'll take another set of eyes to look at this and see if you concur.
Click to view attachment