I've been somewhat absent from MER discussions lately, being caught up in another project, but I am trying to make a comeback. Things are really getting interesting on the Opportunity side, aren't they?
QUOTE (Bill Harris @ May 1 2006, 09:17 PM)
We've been seeing these dark cobbles since before the Erebus Highway: first cobble or two, then these "lag deposits" of increasing concentration. "The Stump" was rather remarkable in that it appeared to be large chunk of ths dark cobble material weathering in-place. This current deposit is remarkable since it is large and concentrated. I want to think that these are lag deposits but sometimes they have the _appearance_ of water-borne gravel. I'l agree with Kenny, we are likely looking at ejecta from Victoria and I'll bet that the ejecta blanket looks just like this deposit.
Oppy did a Moessburg on cobbles at the Erebus Highway and Olympia and found them to be "basaltic", but apparently not interestingly basaltic. I wonder if we have enough views to do a size distribution of the many deposits we've encountered? Are they weathering in place or were they disrupted, tossed and now sit? Can these deposits be spotted on the MOC imagery?
Interesting...
--Bill
Bill: I just wanted to chime in and agree with you. I'm just catching up on the past several days of discussions on these "cobbles," and was planning to point out several of the things you already have. "The Stump" was significant in that it did appear to be a larger ejecta block weathering into the little "cobbles." I recall that SS told us that the cobbles were not meteoritic, but I didn't remember hearing that they were basaltic, though they certainly appear to be. I really think these are lag deposits that we are seeing with greater frequency as we approach VC.
If blocks and cobbles of ejecta would have rained down onto these eolian drifts when VC or some other crater was formed, they quite likely weathered in place creating local concentrations (which eventually became lag deposits) of the dark pieces. As the drifts/ripples moved when they were active, the weathered fragments would have accumulated on the bedrock substrate, and would only be exposed in the inter-drift troughs, or where they were still rolling out of locations embedded within old drifts. An ejecta hypothesis seems to be logical if there were randomly placed blocks that later weathered into fragments. We are seeing the weathered products of basaltic blocks and not weathered blocks of the Burns formation because basalt is relatively refractory while the sulfate cemented rocks mostly vaporized in the impact.
Finally, I also like your prediction that the upper ejecta blanket around VC will contain much of this stuff. It is quite dark, and even darker where wind vortices have blown away the ubiquitous light dust to form the dark streaks on the northern side.
QUOTE (paxdan @ May 3 2006, 12:35 PM)
IMHO it does. The reason we are seeing the horizontal bands is becasue the dues are being eroded. The face of the dune showing the banding is the face being eroded, exposing layers within the weakly consolidated interior. Now what exactly caused those layers when the dunes originally formed it still unknown and there are many candidates: dust storms, sesonal changes etc..
Paxdan: I also think that the horizontal bands are visible because of recent erosion. I was thinking that those horizontal layers that have been exposed are cross sections of the slip faces that originally built up the drifts when they were active.
QUOTE (climber @ May 3 2006, 03:28 PM)
You're gona need a DD on your screen Nico
I think Doug missed this one. DDs have not been known to clean panels!