QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Sep 18 2021, 08:36 AM)
Agreed. It could be a "detrital outwash sediment" derived from basalt and not basalt lava flows. Remember, they described earlier sites as "basaltic" in composition. That term in and of itself is a good tipoff that the answer is not clear cut. I'm looking forward to papers from behind the curtain.
One thing for certain: Mars will not dissppoint.
--Bill
As I mentioned before, I haven't seen anything yet inconsistent with these layered deposits being sedimentary. I have not seen any features consistent with them being extrusive subaerial volcanic flows, or anything that looks like a feature from lava/water reactions. My interpretation right now is that these are subaqueous sediment gravity flow deposits of altered or lightly weathered volcaniclastic sediment, essentially delta front turbidites. Some bed boundaries look like they may preserve current ripples with a finer-grained or mud drape. No indication of internal stratification, yet, which suggests that they are homogenous (let's look for grading, too), or that subsequent alteration has obscured any finer-scale lamination. Sorting looks poor, too, but it's hard to make out clasts versus matrix versus cements even in the abraded areas. Grungy!