QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Nov 8 2011, 03:22 PM)
...and next we could do
Now somewhere in the black mountain hills of Dakota
There lived a young boy named Rocky Raccoonand the whole White Album...
But seriously, @Fredk: "I don't see any veins here - perhaps they want to characterize the rock surrounding the veins?" I think that the light, broad areas are merged or consolidated veins and represent a more massive deposit of the Mystery Mineral. I'd be inclined to go over, inspect, RAT a nice flat spot and zing the chemistry for a few Sols. That would give the most return with the weak MB. If it is in fact a carbonate, it will be soft (Moh 3-4, about liek the siliceous Kieserite), so it would be an easy grind. IDing that mineral is pivotal. And yes, characterizing the surrounding rock (called country rock or wall rock) is needed.
I wish we'd thwack Homestake on the way out... I ~think I see rhombohedral cleavage in some of the fragments, which is very diagnostic.
--Bill
The intent of stopping at Deadwood is to characterize the rock through which Homestake apparently cuts. Squyres, Arvidson and company are very adamant about this piece of data to juxtapose with the content of the Homestake APXS data. The science team doesn't seem to think they -- Homestake and Deadwood -- are the same material at all.
As for RAT'ing or MB: only in our dreams. Long story short, we took a week-long detour that we expected to take only a few sols. The area ended up being so interesting to the science team that they convinced us to delay the trek. We need to boogey north on the double, because we only have so many sols to map the north-facing slopes and find our lily pads. Anything else scientifically intense will have to wait until after winter solstice (March 31).
There is, by the way a truly fascinating story to tell here about the pushback between science and engineering that has gone down over the last several weeks. The lesson of it all is that it has been an extremely productive week for the entire team. There are many considerations to evaluate when saying "we have x sols until we run out of time." It was questionable to take this detour given our need to rush north before certain things outside the control of the project take over and screw us, for lack of a better description. I
would like to talk about a lot of these things in a blog post, but I need to wait until a) there's a press release on the Homestake content (hint: there'll be a press release soon!), since this is absolutely crucial to the discussion of tactical tradeoffs, and
clear it with the project, since it would start peeling the paint off the proverbial privileged-information laws!
So much cool stuff to talk about,
so little room to do it right.
(Hats off to the JPL media relations folks to, for keeping me steered on the right path!)
In any case, let me tell ya: it's been one hell of a week. The days I've been on tactical, I come home exhausted but enormously satisfied. We're really pulling off some magic -- not in sequencing complexity but in teamwork and engineering balancing acts. And the findings at Homestake are... well, pretty cool. Stay tuned. I'm signing off before I get any more proud and before I scoop the press release...
-m