QUOTE (Bobby @ Sep 24 2010, 10:35 PM)
Why is there no rust on them?
I think that is an interesting question worthy of some discussion. At first I dismissed the thought, thinking one would probably not expect a nickel-iron alloy to rust in the Martian atmosphere, considering that the atmosphere contains virtually no free oxygen. However, I think the oxidation potential of the surface environment needs to be considered.
The Phoenix mission discovered perchlorates in the soil. I would think these reasonably strong oxidizing compounds would facilitate the corrosion of metallic iron if liquid water was available mediate the reaction. In the absence of such oxidizing agents I would suspect that UV radiation in that sparse atmosphere might be able to dissociate some CO2, H2O, or other oxygen containing compound to generate some rust with the help of a solvent. If iron oxides cannot be formed, how about some other oxidation products like iron halides or other products of corrosion? It seems that it might not be impossible to oxidize some iron on Mars. What does that imply?
James Sorenson's sand-blasting idea seems reasonable. Rust or other corrosion products are fairly soft. It wouldn't take much wind erosion to remove a bit of rust from a meteorite laying on these wind swept plains. But if these iron meteorites were corroding AND eroding, we would not still see fine features formed by the entry of these meteorites into the atmosphere. I'm speaking of ablation features like the regmaglypts we've seen on some of these meteorites. We've also seen fine, wire-like protrusions of metal into some of the cavities of these metallic meteorites. They suggest that these were originally stony-iron meteorites of some kind. Such protrusions would have been obliterated if the metal was being chemically and physically assaulted.
I'd have to conclude that these hunks of metal have not experienced significant rusting since they fell, but that they would have rusted if liquid water had been available to them.