Sunspot
May 21 2005, 09:50 AM
QUOTE (alan @ May 21 2005, 06:12 AM)
I wonder if they really are sinking in after all. If you look at that picture in detail, there appears to be a dune crest rising up slightly near the right wheel. However, it also appears to be dropping off as we get to see more of it and as Opportubity moves slowly forward.
akuo
May 21 2005, 10:00 AM
QUOTE (Sunspot @ May 21 2005, 09:50 AM)
I wonder if they really are sinking in after all. If you look at that picture in detail, there appears to be a dune crest rising up slightly near the right wheel. However, it also appears to be dropping off as we get to see more of it and as Opportubity moves slowly forward.
They are not sinking (much)! Oppy is driving in an arc as described by the mission managers. Seems that the arc is centered around close to left front wheel. At the rear, the rightmost edge of the left wheel is getting close to the side of the trench.
Well, at least that's how it looks like to me :-)
Sunspot
May 21 2005, 10:07 AM
oops...I meant to say that I dont think it is sinking in that much after all......it might "look" that way because the soil has been rising up near the right wheel because of the dune crest that has become visible. I think it is now dropping away again.
So the latest images that appear at exploratorium show the result of the planned 12m drive?
TheChemist
May 21 2005, 03:02 PM
dot.dk
May 21 2005, 03:19 PM
QUOTE (TheChemist @ May 21 2005, 03:02 PM)
It's just the pancam looking down on the right front wheel
garybeau
May 21 2005, 03:20 PM
QUOTE (TheChemist @ May 21 2005, 10:02 AM)
That is the track that Oppy made just before getting stuck. Because of the lighting direction, some of the image features can look inverted. (at least for me anyway)
Here is the same image rotated 180 degrees.
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y207/gary...HHP2134L2M1.jpgGary
alan
May 21 2005, 03:20 PM
QUOTE (TheChemist @ May 21 2005, 03:02 PM)
If you mean the trench looks wider than the wheels thats because the middle wheels are not in the same line as the forward and rear wheel, they are offset toward the centerline.
dot.dk
May 21 2005, 03:25 PM
TheChemist
May 21 2005, 03:46 PM
I should have known better, this is the N
th time this happens to me.
The minute I read garybeau mentioning a 180o rotated image, I realized I was fooled once more
I guess I should not look at MER imaging while working
Thanks to everyone for their comments.
Tman
May 21 2005, 04:21 PM
QUOTE (garybeau @ May 21 2005, 05:20 PM)
That is the track that Oppy made just before getting stuck. Because of the lighting direction, some of the image features can look inverted. (at least for me anyway)
Here is the same image rotated 180 degrees.
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y207/gary...HHP2134L2M1.jpgGary
In a German astronomy forum there is a woman who is specialising in this phenomenon of inverted views. So far the poor woman isn't able to look for craters in moon pictures - she has only hills in her mind
dilo
May 21 2005, 09:12 PM
QUOTE (Tman @ May 21 2005, 04:21 PM)
In a German astronomy forum there is a woman who is specialising in this phenomenon of inverted views. So far the poor woman isn't able to look for craters in moon pictures - she has only hills in her mind
I experienced exactly the same problem for many years when I was younger; I had to patiently educate (force) my mind to invert images to correct this tendency (however, sometimes happens again!
).
I'm convinced that, years later, this "discipline" helped me to efficently see stereograms, especially crossed-eyes ones; many other peoples aren't able to do this unnatural operation...
I'm curious about other experiences!
Bob Shaw
May 21 2005, 10:18 PM
Personally, I've found that a life-time enthusiasm for 'top shelf' gentlemen's magazines has assisted me enormously in my stereo perception... ...even in non-stereo images!
Seriously, though, it's surprising how many people just don't seem able to do the crossed-eye trick at all. Perhaps when we see the IMAX-3D MER special there'll be the opportunity (geddit?) to seduce a few more folk to the 3D camp!
Well, I *hope* there's an IMAX 3D MER film coming...
dilo
May 21 2005, 11:17 PM
QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ May 21 2005, 10:18 PM)
Personally, I've found that a life-time enthusiasm for 'top shelf' gentlemen's magazines has assisted me enormously in my stereo perception... ...even in non-stereo images!
Seriously, though, it's surprising how many people just don't seem able to do the crossed-eye trick at all. Perhaps when we see the IMAX-3D MER special there'll be the opportunity (geddit?) to seduce a few more folk to the 3D camp!
Well, I *hope* there's an IMAX 3D MER film coming...
Bob, your stereo perception "even in non-stereo images" is very interesting!
It would be really cool to have a 3D film of Mer mission...
edstrick
May 22 2005, 09:19 AM
About 10% of the population is more or less Stereo-Blind, about the same fraction that has some form of color-blindness. I have amblyopia and cannot fuse images to get stereoscopic perception at all. Bit of a pain for a one time <and still amateur> planetary geologist.
Nix
May 22 2005, 12:47 PM
I tried for 4 months and then one day it worked. It's very simple really and I think more people should try it. But I must say I haven't been able to learn it to friends and such..
stereomadness..
Nico
Jeff7
May 22 2005, 02:48 PM
QUOTE (garybeau @ May 21 2005, 11:20 AM)
QUOTE (TheChemist @ May 21 2005, 10:02 AM)
That is the track that Oppy made just before getting stuck. Because of the lighting direction, some of the image features can look inverted. (at least for me anyway)
Here is the same image rotated 180 degrees.
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y207/gary...HHP2134L2M1.jpgGary
Ok, y'all have lost me here. If I may ask, what's up with this "rotate it 180 degrees" thing? What is it said to accomplish?
QUOTE
I experienced exactly the same problem for many years when I was younger; I had to patiently educate (force) my mind to invert images to correct this tendency (however, sometimes happens again! blink.gif ).
I'm convinced that, years later, this "discipline" helped me to efficently see stereograms, especially crossed-eyes ones; many other peoples aren't able to do this unnatural operation...
I'm curious about other experiences!
Hehe, I've been able to cross my eyes since I was in elementary school. My eyes will "uncross" when I get tired, and am still trying to read something. Doing the opposite was always easy - maybe because I used to read so much; my eyes were used to that motion.
TheChemist
May 22 2005, 02:59 PM
Under certain light conditions in an image, I may look at it and confuse intrusions with protrusions.
If I don't realize it immediately, the image looks strange and incomprehensible. A rotation by 180o of the image restores my perception of depth (and whatever is dysfunctional in my brain
) , and I can see the image for what it really is.
dot.dk
May 22 2005, 03:09 PM
Before we get to far OT here...
What do you think will be the next moves in the extraction process?
JRehling
May 22 2005, 06:40 PM
QUOTE (dilo @ May 21 2005, 02:12 PM)
QUOTE (Tman @ May 21 2005, 04:21 PM)
In a German astronomy forum there is a woman who is specialising in this phenomenon of inverted views. So far the poor woman isn't able to look for craters in moon pictures - she has only hills in her mind
I experienced exactly the same problem for many years when I was younger; I had to patiently educate (force) my mind to invert images to correct this tendency (however, sometimes happens again!
).
I'm convinced that, years later, this "discipline" helped me to efficently see stereograms, especially crossed-eyes ones; many other peoples aren't able to do this unnatural operation...
I'm curious about other experiences!
When I have a printed page and this problem crops up, I can usually fix things by rotating the picture so as to match the lighting in the room. Namely, orient it so the shadows in the picture fall away from the main light source in the room where I am. You could try this with a computer image as well, although I recommend rotating the image and not your computer.
bluemars1
May 22 2005, 07:55 PM
Forgive me for the previous blank post. Yes I am definitely a newbie. I was going to suggest that it would be nice to get back on-topic, but it appears I have just exacerbated the problem.
To answer the previous on-topic post, If I were skiing, I'd trudge out of the this crust-covered fluff, and traverse in the valleys as much as possible. Since the rovers don't have the benefit of momentum, they'll have to test every crossing dune very gingerly (e.g. command a meter, visually sense slip, change direction if necessary). I think it's going to be slow stuff (<20 meters/day type progress).
I can't wait until we send humans to orbit Mars and remotely control an entire fleet of rovers in real time. Even these rovers would be about 10x more productive. I will die a happy man if I see that in my lifetime. (oops, I changed topics...er.. Curses! Hoisted on my own petard!)
Sunspot
May 22 2005, 11:43 PM
The rover has moved quite a bit overall:
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...HTP1314R0M1.JPGhttp://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...HTP1214R0M1.JPGIt does appear to be digging it's way out... I wonder if this is what happened during testing on Earth?
mhall
May 23 2005, 07:21 AM
I'm distinctly worried that, when it reaches the end of the gardened, churned-up tracks, Opportunity will just continue swimming through the soft dusty undersoil. I can't see that there will be an 'edge' that the wheels can catch on, to lift out of the dust layer.
Put another way: breaking through the permacrust was like going through a thin sheet of ice on top of a swamp. It may be that the rover is doomed to stay in the swamp, progress being made by just nibbling away at the crust without climbing up on it again.
Of course, the stuff at the base of the dune may be better going, more compacted, easier to climb up on. I certainly hope so.
-- Martin
Sunspot
May 23 2005, 08:55 AM
That was something that I thought about too. As the dune slopes downwards though perhaps there will come a point where, particualrly if the rover doesn't sink any more, the wheels are less buried in the soil and they will drive up out of the trenches they've made.
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...HHP1214R0M1.JPG
dot.dk
May 23 2005, 09:16 AM
If you look at the last drive the right front wheel is already starting to rise and I believe that is a sign of what to come very soon
The left is going a bit down though, but it also has the most dirt to shovel
djellison
May 23 2005, 09:19 AM
I've been trying to understand the 'means' of entry in getting stuck - based on the fact that the front and rear wheels track just about together - and the middle wheels are about 1/3rd of a wheels-width inboard of that. It's plausable that they're not nearly as dug in, but that they're not taking much of the load. It would be interesting to see some graphics based on the articulation of the rocker/bogie (they have this data, it has been reconstructed into movies in the past)
Doug
mars_armer
May 23 2005, 02:54 PM
In the attached images, the blue position is the original "stuck" position, and the overlaid positions are after drives on sols 463-468.
djellison
May 23 2005, 03:59 PM
There we go - THAT's what I'm talking about
Middle wheel is nowhere near as deep as the rest.
Doug
Tesheiner
May 23 2005, 04:43 PM
QUOTE (mars_armer @ May 23 2005, 04:54 PM)
In the attached images, the blue position is the original "stuck" position, and the overlaid positions are after drives on sols 463-468.
... and these images doesn't include drives from 469 to 471, which may add some 12 cm (my guess) of forward movement.
The current situation would be even better.
Tesheiner
dot.dk
May 23 2005, 05:03 PM
Now that's some cool stuff
Looks like my idea of the bogie movement was correct
Didn't Oppy drive today?
Deeman
May 23 2005, 05:11 PM
Oppy seems to move faster with a bit more grip on Sols 470-471. Looks good to me
Deeman
May 23 2005, 05:13 PM
and the right one as well
Dirk
dilo
May 23 2005, 08:10 PM
Agree, is clearly accelerating now!
Look for example to this animation of back/right wheel in the last 4 days (using only half of frames):
http://img74.echo.cx/img74/4821/sol467471rr8dv.gifGo, Oppy, go!
Jeff7
May 23 2005, 11:27 PM
QUOTE (mars_armer @ May 23 2005, 10:54 AM)
In the attached images, the blue position is the original "stuck" position, and the overlaid positions are after drives on sols 463-468.
It looks like the middle wheel is starting to climb onto the churned dirt.
The animations that follow are also encouraging. It looks like it's making excellent progress. I guess they'll have to include a snowplow attachment on the MSL.
jamescanvin
May 24 2005, 02:19 AM
QUOTE (mars_armer @ May 24 2005, 12:54 AM)
In the attached images, the blue position is the original "stuck" position, and the overlaid positions are after drives on sols 463-468.
Thanks, that is exactly what we need to see. We'll be out in no time now!
James
Sunspot
May 24 2005, 10:11 AM
It would be interesting to know how long it took the test rover to escape the drift, and whether it behaved in a similar way to what we are seeing with Opportunity right now.
Did it continue to "dig" through the soil like Oppoertunity is doing....or after a few sols did it drive up out of the trenches on to the surface.
JES
May 24 2005, 05:58 PM
The amount of fill in the left wheel trench is greater than that in the right without any spill to the sides. Does this reflect :
different volumes of material due to different densities before they were disturbed,
deeper pentration by the right wheel below the surface,
better traction on the left wheel moving more material forward as it backs out.
or is there a larger pile of loose material in the way of the right wheel as it continues to back out?
maycm
May 24 2005, 06:29 PM
I thought I read somewhere that they were reversing out in an arc, in which case one side would move more than the other.
djellison
May 24 2005, 07:06 PM
Yes - instead of trying to fight the 7 degree toe-out on that FR wheel, i think they're 'giving in' to it and letting the rover turn to the left as it pushes back
If they were to go straight back down their own trenches, the wheels could end up just churning all the way. By turning the craft a little to 'push' against the left side of the trenches, it gives them something 'new' to have a bite at and pull up out the trenches I guess.
Doug
tuomio
May 24 2005, 10:57 PM
The rear wheels seem to dig themselfs deeper all the time, which is bit alarming. I dont think it means the middle wheels are getting higher, but they both get down as they churn forward. I do not yet think they are on the clear waters even than there is accelerating movement. As they dont actually gather any momentum because the speed is so slow, progress might stop just as quick as it started.
dvandorn
May 24 2005, 11:43 PM
QUOTE (djellison @ May 24 2005, 02:06 PM)
Yes - instead of trying to fight the 7 degree toe-out on that FR wheel, i think they're 'giving in' to it and letting the rover turn to the left as it pushes back
If they were to go straight back down their own trenches, the wheels could end up just churning all the way. By turning the craft a little to 'push' against the left side of the trenches, it gives them something 'new' to have a bite at and pull up out the trenches I guess.
Doug
Yeah, according to the description I read of the maneuver they decided to use, they were going to exit back the way they came, but in a left arc (left in their current direction of travel, which happens to be "forward" since they were driving backward when they got stuck).
It also occurs to me that they don't want to just back straight up, since that puts them heading right back up a dune they had just climbed -- possibly putting the front wheels on that dune before the rear wheels clear the sand trap. A left-arc exit lets them increase the amount of time the three left-side wheels spend on the (presumably) firmer inter-dunal soil. It also, it would appear to me, gets more wheels into the inter-dunal soil more quickly, and for a longer time.
Of course, it *does* sort of look like a right-hand arc would be a better choice to maximize wheels in the inter-dunal soils, but the stuck steering actuator would probably make that pretty difficult, especially pulling out of the trap...
-the other Doug
dot.dk
May 25 2005, 05:48 AM
From:
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/05052...ers_update.htmlQUOTE
At the current rate, it may be two more weeks before Opportunity once again reaches safe ground, Erickson added.
Let's hope the rate picks up soon
jaredGalen
May 25 2005, 07:02 AM
Thr first image in oppy's rear_hazcam page for today the 25th gave me quite a jump.
What the!! Where, what!!! Ooooooohhhhhh.
http://qt.exploratorium.edu:16080/mars/opp...BJP1311L0M1.JPGAnd this is wonderful!!
http://qt.exploratorium.edu:16080/mars/opp...00P1214L0M1.JPG
Pando
May 25 2005, 07:14 AM
Looking back at those images, it's a relief that Oppy didn't venture into the dune trap in the middle of Endurance. We realize this now how dangerous this would have been.
Mode5
May 25 2005, 08:26 AM
QUOTE (jaredGalen @ May 25 2005, 07:02 AM)
Thr first image in oppy's rear_hazcam page for today the 25th gave me quite a jump.
What the!! Where, what!!! Ooooooohhhhhh.
http://qt.exploratorium.edu:16080/mars/opp...BJP1311L0M1.JPGAnd this is wonderful!!
http://qt.exploratorium.edu:16080/mars/opp...00P1214L0M1.JPGI was looking some image sent from 'today' which shows it still on the lander. It's amazing they didn't transmit and purge these earlier with the mem problems.
I looked at the images of where Opie got stuck. We can get a better perspective on the area. I would not have seen any problem with the direction it took. Sadly one has to wonder if they should continue onward into the etched terrain or pick a different target.
dot.dk
May 25 2005, 08:32 AM
Sunspot
May 25 2005, 08:52 AM
QUOTE (dot.dk @ May 25 2005, 06:48 AM)
From:
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/05052...ers_update.htmlQUOTE
At the current rate, it may be two more weeks before Opportunity once again reaches safe ground, Erickson added.
Let's hope the rate picks up soon
Is it just me or are they starting to sound less optomisitc about getting out?
djellison
May 25 2005, 08:57 AM
I wouldnt say less optimistic. Clearly they still think they can get out - and saying it'll take a week, or two weeks, is consistant with the progress we've been making and consistant with the predictions from Steve.
Doug
dot.dk
May 25 2005, 09:00 AM
He also said:
QUOTE
"If Opportunity gets free, its next task will be examining the site to give the rover team a better understanding of how this ripple differs from dozens Opportunity easily crossed," said Jim Erickson.
"If Opportunity gets free"Until now it has always been "When"
But with the steady progress I have no doubt it will get out... They just need to gun it some more...
SFJCody
May 25 2005, 11:52 AM
QUOTE
"If Opportunity gets free, its next task will be examining the site to give the rover team a better understanding of how this ripple differs from dozens Opportunity easily crossed," said Jim Erickson.
Perhaps this ripple overlies a large trough similar to Anatolia.
Trader
May 25 2005, 05:41 PM
"I was looking some image sent from 'today' which shows it still on the lander. It's amazing they didn't transmit and purge these earlier with the mem problems. "
Could one conclude that the massive downloads of the last few days were intended to lighten the rover and assist in getting her unstuck?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.