QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Sep 23 2009, 04:19 AM)
Any stickiness would result in the wheels getting thickly coated with the damp regolith. It would be apparent immediately, and would have become a major problem from sol 1 on. The tracks look much more like impressions in fine dry powder - like lunar tracks as serpens said. But it's the behavior of the dust on the wheels that clinch it - it cakes on and then falls off, it doesn't really stick.
Phil and Serpens - Thanks for your insights. Your logic apears excellent, although "damp" might be completely the wrong word here (i.e., for a molecule-scale coating of polar water molecules on top of unsatisfied ionic bonds), and weak self-adhesion of dust particles, allowing the development of "wet-appearing" vertical walls in ruts, isn't the same as strong bulk adhesion to a vibrating foreign object such as a moving wheel. Utter lack of personal experience dealing with martian conditions (very fine cold heterogeneous salty dust in a near vacuum in a weak gravity field) may have led me, and possibly you also, astray. Terrestrial experience (thick, moist, warm atmosphere, little day-night temperature difference, clay-dominated dust particles or rounded quartz sand, few salts, strong gravity field) could be misleading in dealing with Martian conditions. Lunar experience (perfect vacuum; hot dry angular salt-free glassy agglutinate particles) could also be misleading in this regard.
Bottom line: I don't know who is right, possibly none of us, but I'd be wary of either terrestrial or lunar analogs.
-- HDP Don