lyford
Jan 17 2006, 06:16 PM
jamescanvin can go back to bed for a bit then....
Redstone
Jan 17 2006, 06:18 PM
Good view on NASA TV now of the wind in the palm trees. The vapour from the cryogenic boiloff is being blown a long way from the rocket too.
Rob Pinnegar
Jan 17 2006, 06:20 PM
Get them fingers crossed lads (and lasses)! Here we go!
Sunspot
Jan 17 2006, 06:26 PM
1824 GMT (1:24 p.m. EST)
A new flight profile based on the upper level winds needs to be performed for the delayed launch time. Ground winds are still a concern, and the first stage liquid oxygen fill and drain valve problem has not been put to rest yet.
I'm just waiting for the words SCRUB ! to appear
Toma B
Jan 17 2006, 06:27 PM
QUOTE (MahFL @ Jan 17 2006, 08:54 PM)
Any news on that wind?
MahFL
Jan 17 2006, 06:35 PM
Wind has dropped a bit.
Ames
Jan 17 2006, 06:36 PM
Engineering Poll and Advisory Poll complete and all GO
Still concern about the surface and upper level winds.
Weather baloon information is due in a few minutes.
Fill/Drain valve issue has been sorted
Nick
ugordan
Jan 17 2006, 06:38 PM
New T0 = 19:10 GMT
helvick
Jan 17 2006, 06:39 PM
QUOTE (Toma B @ Jan 17 2006, 07:27 PM)
Pushed out to 19:10 Z, 14:10 EST.
RNeuhaus
Jan 17 2006, 06:39 PM
The Pluto URL
http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/index.php is now very busy and it does not let me to get in and watch the NASA TV. May anyone let me know what is the alternative URL TV source.
Rodolfo
Ames
Jan 17 2006, 06:39 PM
T0 at 19:10
Time to put the kettle on.
Or go grab a soda!
The suspense is killing me! Who needs Hollywood!
Nick
MahFL
Jan 17 2006, 06:39 PM
MahFL
Jan 17 2006, 06:40 PM
QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jan 17 2006, 06:39 PM)
The Pluto URL
http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/index.php is now very busy and it does not let me to get in and watch the NASA TV. May anyone let me know what is the alternative URL TV source.
Rodolfo
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/countdown/video/
Redstone
Jan 17 2006, 06:42 PM
PhilCo126
Jan 17 2006, 06:47 PM
Does anybody know of the great features shown at NASA TV about preparing the launch vehicle are available online ?
They should make a DVD out of this, the Atlas V is a real beauty
dvandorn
Jan 17 2006, 06:49 PM
I feel a little guilty, what with all of you trying to keep a streaming video connection going so you can see blurry images of the rocket.
My cable system got its act together a couple of months ago, and we once again have a very nice, clean NASA-TV signal. And I have a DVR, so I'm recording the launch (though I've got a good hour of the thing just sitting on the pad at this point...
...)
-the other Doug
RNeuhaus
Jan 17 2006, 06:51 PM
Great boys,
Now I am able to see thru the NASA TV at
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/.
Now I see NH spewing white smog on the middle height of rocket. Is that the water vapor?
Rodolfo
ugordan
Jan 17 2006, 06:53 PM
QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jan 17 2006, 07:51 PM)
Now I am able to see thru the NASA TV at
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/.
Yeah, the connection seems to have "cleared up" a bit now. Knock on wood...
mchan
Jan 17 2006, 06:53 PM
While waiting, I checked the Front Page and see that 83 folks are online now. BTW, what's the record?
Toma B
Jan 17 2006, 06:54 PM
Spaceflightnow.com
1852 GMT (1:52 p.m. EST)
A Lockheed Martin spokesman says the upper level wind issue is actually at an altitude of 800 feet. Attempts to develop a flight profile to withstand the current wind conditions failed the past two tries, he said.
More and more it looks like it will not fly anywhere today...
...hope I'm wrong...
PhilCo126
Jan 17 2006, 06:56 PM
Well, Attempts to develop a new flight profile to withstand the current wind conditions failed but they await new meteo data hoping the winds dropped...
Launch window open untill 03:23
MahFL
Jan 17 2006, 06:56 PM
QUOTE (Toma B @ Jan 17 2006, 06:54 PM)
1852 GMT (1:52 p.m. EST)
A Lockheed Martin spokesman says the upper level wind issue is actually at an altitude of 800 feet. Attempts to develop a flight profile to withstand the current wind conditions failed the past two tries, he said.
That sounds like its going to be a scrub for today, with bad wx tomorrow too
ugordan
Jan 17 2006, 06:56 PM
Damn! 19:30 GMT new T0...
Bjorn Jonsson
Jan 17 2006, 06:57 PM
Delayed to 19:30 GMT.
helvick
Jan 17 2006, 06:57 PM
T0 now at 19:30 Z, 14:30 EST.
Jeff7
Jan 17 2006, 06:57 PM
QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jan 17 2006, 01:49 PM)
I feel a little guilty, what with all of you trying to keep a streaming video connection going so you can see blurry images of the rocket.
My cable system got its act together a couple of months ago, and we once again have a very nice, clean NASA-TV signal. And I have a DVR, so I'm recording the launch (though I've got a good hour of the thing just sitting on the pad at this point...
...)
-the other Doug
May I recommend the XviD codec then, if you plan on posting the video? If you like, e-mail me and I can send you a nice tutorial on getting good results with Virtualdub.
MahFL
Jan 17 2006, 06:58 PM
NEW LAUNCH TIME. Liftoff has been pushed back to 2:30 p.m. EST.
RNeuhaus
Jan 17 2006, 06:59 PM
In the afternoon, around Florida usually have lots of winds and I am afraid that its wind strength will last until late afternoon. When I was a university student, I have salied around Key Biscayne, Miami and I know that zone has good afternoon winds.
Hope that the sky becomes a good gentlemen for a while to let the NH to streak to Pluto.
Rodolfo
ugordan
Jan 17 2006, 07:00 PM
QUOTE (Jeff7 @ Jan 17 2006, 07:57 PM)
May I recommend the XviD codec then, if you plan on posting the video? If you like, e-mail me and I can send you a nice tutorial on getting good results with Virtualdub.
Personally, I'd go with the H.264 codec, IMHO it outclasses both XviD and DivX codecs. There's a free implementation available called x264 for AVI and as I understand, newer versions of QuickTime already support H.264.
dvandorn
Jan 17 2006, 07:00 PM
QUOTE (Jeff7 @ Jan 17 2006, 12:57 PM)
May I recommend the XviD codec then, if you plan on posting the video? If you like, e-mail me and I can send you a nice tutorial on getting good results with Virtualdub.
Unfortunately, the DVR isn't connectable to my computer, and I have no stand-alone DVD recorder, so I have no way to port it to the PC for uploading...
-the other Doug
PhilCo126
Jan 17 2006, 07:02 PM
Does anybody know if there's an onboard camera simular to the ones used on Delta launch vehicle showing the ride up into space with a good vantage point to see the solids drop away ?
elakdawalla
Jan 17 2006, 07:05 PM
Did anybody catch what that anomalous-sounding announcement just was?
yaohua2000
Jan 17 2006, 07:06 PM
QUOTE (PhilCo126 @ Jan 17 2006, 07:02 PM)
Does anybody know if there's an onboard camera simular to the ones used on Delta launch vehicle showing the ride up into space with a good vantage point to see the solids drop away ?
Yes, there are 3 rocket cameras, two on 1st stage (one downward, one upward), one on 2nd stage (upward).
Toma B
Jan 17 2006, 07:06 PM
QUOTE (PhilCo126 @ Jan 17 2006, 10:02 PM)
Does anybody know if there's an onboard camera simular to the ones used on Delta launch vehicle showing the ride up into space with a good vantage point to see the solids drop away ?
No, there are no outside cameras on Atlas5.
ilbasso
Jan 17 2006, 07:07 PM
Antigua tracking station offline due to a transmitter, but should be back up on time
Analyst
Jan 17 2006, 07:08 PM
It feels like a scrub day. But you never know.
yaohua2000
Jan 17 2006, 07:08 PM
QUOTE (Toma B @ Jan 17 2006, 07:06 PM)
No, there are no outside cameras on Atlas5.
Are you sure? I read there are 3 cameras.
Jeff7
Jan 17 2006, 07:08 PM
QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 17 2006, 02:00 PM)
Personally, I'd go with the H.264 codec, IMHO it outclasses both XviD and DivX codecs. There's a free implementation available called x264 for AVI and as I understand, newer versions of QuickTime already support H.264.
x264 looks like it's still in its infancy. I just figured XviD because it's more widespead and mature.
Edit: I just encoded a video with x264 and Virtualdub. Output in WMP is grey and garbled.
Toma B
Jan 17 2006, 07:08 PM
QUOTE (yaohua2000 @ Jan 17 2006, 10:06 PM)
Yes, there are 3 rocket cameras, two on 1st stage (one downward, one upward), one on 2nd stage (upward).
Where did you get that information?
Ames
Jan 17 2006, 07:10 PM
Launch is No-Go with current upper winds
We have 20minutes for the wind to die down
Bill Harris
Jan 17 2006, 07:11 PM
Intellicast Winds is not _the_ authoritative source, but it does not look favorable.
--Bill
yaohua2000
Jan 17 2006, 07:11 PM
QUOTE (Toma B @ Jan 17 2006, 07:08 PM)
Where did you get that information?
I don't remember very clearly, maybe from a PDF at pluto.jhuapl.edu.
Sunspot
Jan 17 2006, 07:14 PM
arghhhhh the tension lol
Toma B
Jan 17 2006, 07:15 PM
QUOTE (yaohua2000 @ Jan 17 2006, 10:11 PM)
I don't remember very clearly, maybe from a PDF at pluto.jhuapl.edu.
I have it in my hand and there is no mention of any cameras there...
Does anybody knows for sure?
Redstone
Jan 17 2006, 07:15 PM
I don't see any mention of NH on the company website for Rocketcam, who have put cameras on Atlas V in the past, and will later this year.
Rocketcam launch schedule
Ames
Jan 17 2006, 07:15 PM
New profile sucessfully calculated and loaded into the IMU
Looks OK
ugordan
Jan 17 2006, 07:16 PM
AFAIK, there are no cameras mounted on the rocket, Alan Stern mentioned regretting about it. They needed every kilogram of payload available to the spacecraft itself...
dvandorn
Jan 17 2006, 07:18 PM
The tension in this room is palpable, gentlemen...
-the other Doug
Ames
Jan 17 2006, 07:20 PM
[HOLD IT!] - need to use the bathroom
dvandorn
Jan 17 2006, 07:21 PM
Go quickly, count resumes in five minutes (if it resumes at all)...
-the other Doug
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.