QUOTE (brellis @ Sep 2 2008, 11:51 PM)
And how cool would it be to get back close to square one several years after landing?
In all honesty, it would make me feel like continued mission funding would have been better diverted to MSL. Does anyone else feel that, cobbles aside, that any major science was bypassed on the way to Victoria? As much as people refer to it as the rush to get there, I found the journey maddeningly methodical from a purely "tourist" perspective. They stopped and did a LOT of science, even if it wasn't always by choice.
They left Victoria because they felt there was nothing to find there that would be of Mars-shaking significance. I have to think that's how they feel about retracing their journey. Just a lot of work for little added science. I just don't see the need to backtrack any further than to squint at a few tempting cobbles.
Any long term study of track alterations can wait for the day when the rover is hobbled and has all the time in the world to sit and study the changes to the world around her. Preferably, somewhere in the vicinity of Ithaca.