Collage of PJ38 initial downlink Jupiter images, Exaggerated Color/Contrast
Click to view attachment

Some nice detail in PJ38


Jupiter - PJ38-20 - Detail


Jupiter - PJ38-21 - Detail


Jupiter - PJ38-25 - Detail

More Jovian detail


Jupiter - PJ38-24



Jupiter - PJ38-22 - Detail

JunoCam was not messing around. The detail this perijove is amazing


Jupiter - PJ38-26/27 - Detail


Jupiter - PJ38-30 - Detail

Words fail. Beautiful work Kevin.

The bank of white stratus clouds in image PJ38-30 is amazing. I can't recall seeing stratus clouds that extensive and well-defined. Do we have an idea of the scale of that image?

--Bill

Mike,
Is there a problem with PJ38_17 and PJ38_18? I just noticed they are not on the missionjuno site.

Those showed black monoliths so we had to hold them back from the public

Seriously, if we haven't posted something, it's usually because it still has residual data drops that we are waiting to be filled in.

I suppose it's not surprising monolith induced wormholes would interfere with data downlinks.

Anyhooo...

Here are PJ38 images. Exaggerated Color/Contrast. Using new color balance adapted to JunoCams shifting color response.
Click to view attachment
Full resolution 19293-by-27897 available at https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/junocam/processing?id=11989

Do you think any more data will come down for the PJ38 partial images, or is it done and we've got all we're going to get?

I'll ask, but I suspect those will remain partial. The drops are fairly minimal so I'll see if we can post them.

My understanding from our ops folks is that if you see an image that's marked "partial" on missionjuno, then we have exhausted all ways to fill it in and this is the best we are ever going to get. So PJ38 is all done.

Thanks for the clarification. I'm glad that we can at least get partial data when there are problems.