Looking for a project? Well, here are a few models of Curiosity to try your hand at.

This is the first one. There are two versions from the same instructions.
Click to view attachment

Here are the instructions: Click to view attachment

This is another one that has some different details.
Click to view attachment

Here's the link: http://www.paper-replika.com/index.php?opt...p;Itemid=200144

If you want to download it, the model requires your OK to a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Basically, click the "I agree" radial button, submit and the model is yours.

Then if you want to take it to a completely new level, take a look at what this guy is doing
http://www.papermodelers.com/forum/pasa-pa...tory-build.html

Have fun!

I finished my model this afternoon. Took about a week of evenings and a lot of patience.
Click to view attachment

The grid it's sitting on has 1cm squares marked out.

The good thing about having the model parts on the PDF is that you can easily scale it up or add bits before you print it out.
I added a few details like the actual photo of the ChemCam and Mastcam cameras.

Still a few more refinements to go, but it worked out OK.
Once you have the basic parts, you could refine details as much as you like.

Thanks Astro0! Finally something 'constructive' to do!

Not bad ... but the best paper model of Curiosity (including DS) I found is this one from "merzo" : http://www.papermodelers.com/forum/pasa-pa...nks-yogi-7.html
IMHO real paper magician

There is some amazing work going on over at that Forum.

As talented as the people on UMSF are for image and data interpretation, the wizards at Papermodelers are turning out some incredible stuff.

You can look around as a guest, but if you want to download any of the models/instructions, you need to join.
But hey, it's totally free just like UMSF!

Not directly related to papercraft models but more general.
I still can't understand why NASA/JPL, when they did so much excellent work on PR, mission visualization, actions for kids and general public, why they also didn't make deal with some model kit company like Rewell, or hi-precise model toy/replica producers like Dragon, Schuco, Wit's, etc. to glut market with nice and detail plastic or metal model of Curiosity.
I'm sure it would be immediately best seller not only in US but worldwide. There is at least 1,2 mil names written on SYNTM chips on board of the rover. At least milion peple would love to have such a model at home, I guess.
I would buy at least one or two for sure, for any price!

Kit production takes time and money, from design to testing, production and marketing. Lead time on this could be months, to a year.

While, Sojourner, Spirit and Opportunity have all had success with toys being produced (Matchbox micromachines and Lego models), the fear from a manufacturers point of view would be the scenario as happened with Mars Polar Lander. Models produced but no mission to follow and hence no sales.
Same deal here. If MSL had not gone so well, then any models produced would be a big cost hit to the production company.

There will be toys out there. Later this month, the Matchbox toy rolls out onto the shelves. We might also get to see the Lego version now that it has reached the required 'likes' on their website. You never know, there might even be model kits (although they don't happen often these days) or remote control toys.

There are already instructions out there from Lego enthusiasts about how to build your own Curiosity rover right now.
I've even seen a very cool motorised and remote controlled version that someone built using Lego Mindstorm (on Youtube somewhere).

Remember that NASA makes arrangements with 'education partners' when they do these sorts of things (eg: Lego/MER).
For them, it's about the mission. For the commerical companies, it's about the dollars.

OK Astro0, thanks for the explanation. Make sense to wait with model roll out till the spacecraft successful landing which can promise better ROI.
Looking forward to see what Matchbox and/or other producers will offer in comming weeks, months.
Hopefully it'll be better then this one from Mattel's Hot Wheels, at least so good as this MER model.

Luxury! When I was a lad, we could only dream about Martian rover Hot Wheels.
This was the closest I got to a space toy, and I was glad to have it.

Brian

I HAD THAT TOY! But we couldn't afford balloons so I used rocks.

Brian

Hmm. In the case of Pathfinder and Galileo, this was a deal between JPL (not NASA, per se) and Mattel. See http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/releases/97/workshop.html
and http://articles.latimes.com/1998/oct/05/news/ls-29380

At least the Pathfinder and Galileo (and MPL) models were fairly accurate. The MSL one, not so much.

As a modeler from an early age, I'm pretty concerned that the profit motive of the big aerospace companies and licensing fees will severely impact the hobby. I'm not sure that JPL is much better.

My little Sojourner model sits in my office.
Click to view attachment

I still have another 8 unopened sets at home. They are quite collectable.
One of the sets was personally signed by Ed Stone during a visit to Australia.
I also have the Galileo set (which includes a DSN 70-metre antenna) and the MPL, MCO and Deep Space 2 miniatures set.

I'm sure that there'll be more models in the future of classic and contemporary spacecraft.
I've been building kits for years and have dozens of models at home just waiting for a quiet weekend (or more likely, my retirement).

No doubt that the interest in Curiosity's mission will lead to a new generation of spacecraft modelling engineers
That's one of the reasons I like the work being done by the paper modellers.
They have to design almost from scratch with only photos as a guide.
The same goes for the 3D cgi modellers. Awesome work!

And some of them goes to metal, wood and all materials to meke even 1:1 moving replica, like they did in 2004 at Prag's Planetarium.
http://www.planetarium.cz/old/kalendar/Mars/MER_v_PL.htm

Edit:
sorry if this post is too much OT (not paper, nor Curiosity). I just wanted to point out how some modellers goes to extreme.