Titan is place hard to understand, so we can expect almost everything.
I read one article, written before Cassini-Huygens (~2000), in which authors stated, that's existence of big dunes on Titan is highly improbable.
"At the time the surface was compared with creme brulee, though later they backed off from the implications of that comparison by suggesting that the penetrometer striking and sliding off a pebble into dry sand would fit the data."
I think, that they still talked about material soaked by methane. This was based on evaporation of methane, which was registered by GCMS.
The composition of surface vapours obtained by GCMS after landing shows that Huygens landed on a surface wet with methane, which evaporated as the cold soil was heated by the warmer probe. (from
ESA)