From Doug's glog installment on
Venus Express:
>Schwelm explained that when you do this "copy" of a spacecraft design, you have to do it rapidly without
>a gap. It's been a year since they finished working on VEX and thus the heritage is essentially lost --
>the teams have changed and it would not be as cost effective to do the same thing again ....
Now that's interesting. The topic of how much money can be saved by reusing spacecraft design comes up all the time, but I had not realized that the deadline was so short. It increases my admiration for ESA's ability to put together support for the two Express missions.
TTT