T44 Flyby (May 28, 2008), The Last Flyby of the Primary Mission |
![]() ![]() |
T44 Flyby (May 28, 2008), The Last Flyby of the Primary Mission |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 ![]() |
Rev 69 Looking ahead is up!
http://ciclops.org/view/4889/Rev_69 The T44 Flyby highlights include:
-Mike -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 611 Joined: 23-February 07 From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD Member No.: 1764 ![]() |
Rev 69 Looking ahead is up! http://ciclops.org/view/4889/Rev_69 The T44 Flyby highlights include:
-Mike Ciclops doesnt speak for all of Cassini. They write their own stuff, based on earlier project discussion. In this case they may be wrong - I think the scat and rad had to be deleted because of the DSN being taken by Phoenix. Better to refer to the project flyby summary |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3234 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 ![]() |
I know that Ralph. I mention that in the summary.
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 568 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Silesia Member No.: 299 ![]() |
T44 Mission description is now up!
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/prod...description.pdf TITAN-44 SCIENCE HIGHLIGHTS
-------------------- Free software for planetary science (including Cassini Image Viewer).
http://members.tripod.com/petermasek/marinerall.html |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 ![]() |
I wonder if it would be possible to include the expected SAR RADAR Swath track in the mission description?
I'm really curious to know if this swath will view Kerguelen Facula (which I bet will look like Sotra Facula) or image any parts of the Sliced Carrot feature of NW Shangri-La. -Mike -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3234 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 ![]() |
No, the swath cuts a little further north than Kerguelen.
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 611 Joined: 23-February 07 From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD Member No.: 1764 ![]() |
I wonder if it would be possible to include the expected SAR RADAR Swath track in the mission description? The SAR swaths are not as straightforwardly pipelined a product as the image views are. Nothing is impossible. Everything takes work. Who do you think writes the captions for these image releases? It's part of the job, but not a part that gets you fame and fortune. (Arguably writing papers for Science doesnt get you those either, but at least journal publications are a metric by which planetary scientists' careers are partly judged.) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 ![]() |
Who do you think writes the captions for these image releases? It's part of the job, but not a part that gets you fame and fortune. I've spent many an evening browsing through the Planetary Photojournal. I've found the captions easily understandable and very well written. The legends usually capture the essence of a key concept in planetary science. Each image provides yet another vignette of a beautifully complex system slowly being revealed. I see it as a part of the continuum of research and education. The scientific papers have the full research, but are accessible and understandable to a limited few (and don't even get me started about journal access). In contrast, the Planetary Photojournal images and CHARM presentations are freely available and are for a much wider audience. Even in the UMSF domain of amateur enthusiasts, most of the Planetary Photojournal images are picked up and discussed immediately, while a lesser fraction of the scientific papers are presented. I'd be interested in knowing how many hits an image in the Planetary Photojournal gets compared to an article in a scientific journal. Even more important, who is reading it? I can imagine an interested high school student surfing the Planetary Photojournal, but not easily browsing the latest issue of Icarus. (Most high school libraries don't carry Icarus). -Mike -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 611 Joined: 23-February 07 From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD Member No.: 1764 ![]() |
I've spent many an evening browsing through the Planetary Photojournal. I've found the captions easily understandable and very well written. ..... I'd be interested in knowing how many hits an image in the Planetary Photojournal gets compared to an article in a scientific journal. .... Even more important, who is reading it? I can imagine an interested high school student surfing the Planetary Photojournal, but not easily browsing the latest issue of Icarus. (Most high school libraries don't carry Icarus). Very good points, Mike. I guess you're guilting us into being more diligent about these! FYI, what happens is the team decides on image segments to release (e.g. that do not compromise upcoming publications and perhaps adjust/improve their appearance, since first SAR processing run with predicted attitude and ephemeris can be ratty) and then writes a draft caption. Captions then get edited and approved by JPL and HQ, which typically takes several days - this process usually entails the introduction of english units and the removal of terms that are too arcanely geological (i.e. specific and accurate). So it can be pretty thankless. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 ![]() |
Even more important, who is reading it? I can imagine an interested high school student surfing the Planetary Photojournal, but not easily browsing the latest issue of Icarus. (Most high school libraries don't carry Icarus). Based on comments a friends of mine made about the athletic shoe industry, I've always seen space science aficionado-dom similarly. There is a tiny group of hardcore practitioners doing active research at the top, then a larger but still small group of heavy fans, then a much larger group of people who give the topic their attention from time to time, and the larger still, perhaps, group of people who don't care at all. The career rewards that Ralph allude to key very highly off the responses of the tippy-top alone, factoring in appeal to the next segments down almost not at all. Unless, like Carl Sagan, you create a PR tour de force like "Cosmos". Of course, that's not all Sagan did... It's true in other disciplines as well. You've got some jazz musicians out there who are respected largely by other jazz musicians and hardly sell any records at all. As to which deserve more accolades is a matter of philosophy -- and funding. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Director of Galilean Photography ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 896 Joined: 15-July 04 From: Austin, TX Member No.: 93 ![]() |
So it can be pretty thankless. Sounds like a perfect job for some UMSF volunteers. ![]() -------------------- Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
-- "The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 568 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Silesia Member No.: 299 ![]() |
-------------------- Free software for planetary science (including Cassini Image Viewer).
http://members.tripod.com/petermasek/marinerall.html |
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Forum Contributor ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1373 Joined: 8-February 04 From: North East Florida, USA. Member No.: 11 ![]() |
I just noticed the subheading....last flyby of the primary mission already, I can remember when she was launched
![]() |
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 61 Joined: 17-September 05 From: Sweden Member No.: 499 ![]() |
Has it really been 44 titan flybys? Truly amazing, it feels like the first mapping began yesterday
![]() |
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 611 Joined: 23-February 07 From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD Member No.: 1764 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st July 2024 - 09:47 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
![]() |