Proposed Russian lunar orbiter and lander projects, Post 2015 |
Proposed Russian lunar orbiter and lander projects, Post 2015 |
Jan 20 2013, 11:52 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 6336 |
The mission named Luna-Glob are said to consist of one orbiter and one lander.
Russia to the Moon in 2015 |
|
|
Jan 22 2013, 12:18 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 6-January 13 From: Belgrade, Serbia Member No.: 6827 |
List of scientific instruments of "Luna-Resource" and of "Luna-Glob" lander.
Just let the text be translated. Although I don't know whether this website (Luna-Resource project website; apparently still under construction) is reliable whatsoever, I do trust these are the instruments to be lifted. -------------------- "Go then, there are other worlds than these." - Jake of New York
|
|
|
Jan 22 2013, 12:30 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10231 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
You can learn more than you ever dreamed of about Luna-Glob and its companion Luna-Resurs (combined with Chandrayaan-2) on this site:
http://www.iki.rssi.ru/eng/conf/2011-lg/index.html Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Jan 22 2013, 12:20 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10231 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
This just in... apparently Chandrayaan 2 will not be combined with Lune-Resurs any more. India will build its own lander for Chandrayaan 2 due to a delay with Luna-Resurs.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Jan 23 2013, 05:49 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 6-January 13 From: Belgrade, Serbia Member No.: 6827 |
I guess two missions are better than one.
QUOTE "...PRL director Jitendra Goswami clarified that this did not mean that the Indo-Russian collaboration on planetary exploration had ended. Since Chandrayaan-2 was intended to be Roskosmos’ Luna-Glob moon exploration programme, the Russian agency may join hands with ISRO in any of its lunar missions, Dr. Murty said." Resource: The Hindu Nevertheless, I hope this means enough space was left for the possible rejoining of these two missions. That would guarantee some level of financial certainty for both. -------------------- "Go then, there are other worlds than these." - Jake of New York
|
|
|
Jan 23 2013, 09:04 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10231 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
It's hard to tell what is going on, as contradictory statements are now coming out of India. We'll have to wait and see.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Jan 24 2013, 04:59 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 715 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 351 |
I find the Chinese, Indian, and Russian programs hard to follow. There's often bursts of detailed information, but it's hard to separate out proposals from committed plans. In the case of the latter two programs, tight budgets may be a cause of more frequent replans than other programs have.
This lack of information is why I don't give these programs as much attention on my blog as they deserve. -------------------- |
|
|
Aug 9 2014, 11:14 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 149 Joined: 18-June 08 Member No.: 4216 |
According to this post by Anatoly Zak:
http://www.russianspaceweb.com/spacecraft_...etary_2014.html the first wave of three Luna-Glob missions has been delayed by three years. The first one in the series is now not expected until 2019. Tolis. |
|
|
Dec 9 2014, 03:20 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 166 Joined: 20-September 05 From: North Texas Member No.: 503 |
Nature.com announces that ESA is actively looking into joint lunar landers with Russia:
http://www.nature.com/news/europe-proposes...-russia-1.16517 |
|
|
Jun 15 2018, 02:42 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10231 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Another delay, apparently. This site:
http://www.spaceflightfans.cn/33111.html says that Luna 25 (Luna-Glob lander) will be postponed 2 years to 2021, with the next two missions, orbiter and lander, following at yearly intervals. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Jul 7 2020, 07:50 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 291 Joined: 29-December 05 From: Ottawa, ON Member No.: 624 |
Sorry, I earlier posted this in the wrong thread.
Some good news about Russia's Luna 25, that it's still on-track for an October 1, 2021 launch. http://en.roscosmos.ru/21544/ |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th September 2024 - 05:24 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |