Space Exploration Labor Shortage |
Space Exploration Labor Shortage |
May 25 2023, 03:46 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 251 Joined: 14-January 22 Member No.: 9140 |
This article in the Washington Post is behind a firewall, but adds some detail to the story that began with a delay of Psyche and threatens to delay or "soft cancel" VERITAS.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/inte...ion-challenges/ The single point that most squarely defines the situation is, "They just don’t have the manpower they need to do the missions." That's not a situation that can be fixed overnight, but hopefully it's addressed in due time. It seems like massive layoffs in the commercial tech industry might provide the headcount to address this. |
|
|
May 25 2023, 08:54 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2542 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
The single point that most squarely defines the situation is, "They just don’t have the manpower they need to do the missions." I haven't read the article but this is more or less what the review board report said -- https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/at...se_nov_2022.pdf Not to be cynical, but I refer to you to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month QUOTE Its central theme is that adding manpower to a software project that is behind schedule delays it even longer. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
May 30 2023, 08:12 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 251 Joined: 14-January 22 Member No.: 9140 |
I have cited The Mythical Man-Month often, including recently, and agree entirely that adding people to a project might in many circumstances slow it down. Unfortunately, it's also true that subtracting people from a project may also slow it down.
I have no doubt that adding people is not likely to speed up a project (Psyche) right away, and it may not even help VERITAS now, but in the long run, there is an amount of staffing required to run multiple missions, and both the review board and the NASA replies conclude that current staffing is low and that increases are beneficial. As for the timeline of the staffing up helping more than it hurts, the devil's in the details. Interviewing alone is a drag on short-term progress. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 04:19 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |