Find me at......, Where can people find you once the server shuts down |
Find me at......, Where can people find you once the server shuts down |
Oct 25 2024, 02:16 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Interplanetary Dumpster Diver Group: Admin Posts: 4405 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
I'm on Twitter/X @tedstryk (for now at least)
The following accounts are ones I don't use much but would if a community developed. I am also @tedstryk on Threads and Bluesky. I am @tedstryk.mastadon.social and @tedstryk on Discord. I am @tedstryk on Instagram, but I only use that account for pictures from my personal life. -------------------- |
|
|
Oct 25 2024, 05:31 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
I don't know what happens in the paywalled "L2" area but I don't know of anything specific to planetary. From what's implied, people posting there, if they have real inside information, are breaking their project rules of the road at a minimum, if they're not guilty of actual ITAR/EAR violations. IMHO even some of the stuff posted in the public areas (by one NASA insider in particular) is skirting the rules. So in that regard it's a good source of information, although the SNR is extremely low (mostly from fanboys of a company with X in its name). I've more or less given up posting there (pearls before swine, as they say.) YMMV. Yes, NSF has got nowhere near the S/N ratio of this forum. In terms of L2 content, you're not really missing out on much, it's mostly a few regular NASA/industry insiders giving a heads-up on something that'll (probably) become public some time later, anyways. I don't think I've seen violations of ITAR and such over my stay there (not that I really know how strict ITAR really is), the OG posters themselves are aware of just how much info they can share so it's usually carefully worded. I get the impression the creator of the site gets even more info than what those L2 insiders provide, but is threading the needle of not posting too much sensitive/proprietary info. In general, NSF is a much more rocket-oriented than a science-oriented site like UMSF, even though they do have a Space Science section. I'm glad I see some of the folks around here posting there, like Phil Stooke and vjkane. Sad part is, for example for Juno Galilean flybys, all I could really do there is link to UMSF image wizards' posts here. Not sure how that'll work out in the future. I'd say the site could have had the potential of carrying on the torch of UMSF, were it not for those very same fanboys (not just of the X company). -------------------- |
|
|
Today, 01:05 AM
Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1030 Joined: 9-September 17 From: UK Member No.: 8241 |
You can find me just about everywhere lol
FACEBOOK (Personal) FACEBOOK (Gigapans) FACEBOOK-MMPU gigapan.com GIGAmacro.com 360cities.com flickr X reddit.com The Cydonia Institute YOUTUBE MASTODON and now DISCORD-UMSF -------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st November 2024 - 01:27 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |