IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Shoreline On Titan: Best Evidence Yet
Palomar
post Sep 17 2005, 12:28 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 48
Joined: 11-August 05
Member No.: 463



Best evidence yet

*...for a shoreline on Titan; they're calling it "dramatic." Area measures 1,060 by 106 miles. Is from Cassini radar, obtained during the latest flyby. Speculation continues regarding seepage of liquid from the ground/ground springs and/or rainfall.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Sep 18 2005, 10:22 PM
Post #2





Guests






David: Nobody is saying that the methane rain that hits the surface is IMMEDIATELY soaked up by the ground. Just as in Earth's deserts, when Titan has one of its very rare but very violent rainstorms, the liquid runs along the surface, carving arroyos, until it ends up in "playas" -- temporary lakes which then slowly disappear as their liquid either evaporates back into the air or trickles deeper underground. Huygens (by very good luck) landed in exactly such a classic desert playa -- I can't think of a landing spot for it that could have given us a better understanding of what's actually happening on Titan.

Now, the liquid ETHANE that forms in Titan's air, as a result of radiation modification of some of its methane, is a different matter. It forms at such an incredibly slow rate (1/4 micron per year, at absolute most) that when the ethane mist does gradually drift down and settle on surface soil particles, it has plenty of time to slowly seep directly down into the local ground, and finally into the subsurface methane/ethane aquifer. (And, unlike the methane, the ethane will never evaporate back into the air once it's formed -- its vapor pressure in Titan's current atmosphere is only about 1/1000 that for methane.) Indeed, it's now a safe bet that the 300-1000 meters worth of liquid ethane that Titan has formed over the eons has now been widely spread throughout a very great depth of its crust by cryovolcanic cycling, explaining why we're not seeing much on the surface.

Meanwhile, the smaller amount of solid organics simultaneously formed out of Titan's methane by radiation (acetylene and tholins), after they settle down onto the surface, naturally just sit there until another violent methane rainstorm washes them into the arroyos and thence into Titan's large system of playas to form the accumulation of dark crud that we see there. (This is the one respect in which Titan is in no way an analog of Earth -- the water vapor and droplets in Earth's air do not undergo chemical reactions that turn some of them permanently into other liquid and solid substances with different physical properties, which then settle down onto the surface. Titan, by contrast, very slowly turns some of its "water" into smog.)

Richard: The evidence does indeed seem to be that the aquifer on Titan is quite deeply buried, and that it IS frequently forced back up to the surface (in liquid form) by tidal geothermal heating (strange to use that term about Titan). Remember that, while many of the channels seen by both Cassini and Huygens have fine tributaries indicating that they were carved by widespread rain, others have fewer and stubby branches suggesting that the source of the liquid in their case was from springs. And Huygens photographed a concentration of those in the same general region of the surface where it also saw what appears to be a relatively recent domelike upthrusting of the surface. Moreover, Cassini has already located two regions on the surface where there are some signs that flat-out geysers and pools of hydrothermally heated methane may be erupting into the air -- Titanian Yellowstones.

But, in any case, a buried aquifer doesn't require geothermal heating to release evaporated vapor back into the air -- if surface rain can seep down to it, vapor can rise upwards from it and out through the same surface pores much more easily.

I should add that my reason for thinking that Cassini's radar hasn't yet seen any really deep bodies of liquid is simply that one can plainly see a mottled texture within even the most radar-dark regions we've seen on it -- except, perhaps, for that very dark kidney-shaped southern patch the size of Lake Ontario, which may be a genuine deep body of liquid on the current surface. The rest of the dark regions seen so far cannot be covered by more than a few dozen meters of liquid or they'd be totally black. Indeed, since solid hydrocarbons look almost as dark to Cassini's radar, most of the dark regions seen by it so far are likely to be just mudflats with no surface liquid -- and a lot of them may even currently be DRY mudflats. A lot of that dark "sea" shown in the latest Cassini radar image is actually likely to be -- when we see it on the surface -- a dry, cracked mudflat, waiting to be remoistened by the next very rare but violent rain.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Richard Trigaux_*
post Sep 20 2005, 07:32 AM
Post #3





Guests






QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Sep 18 2005, 10:22 PM)
But, in any case, a buried aquifer doesn't require geothermal heating to release evaporated vapor back into the air -- if surface rain can seep down to it, vapor can rise upwards from it and out through the same surface pores much more easily.
*


Not quite sure. On Earth there are situations with aquifers into deserts (for instance the huge aquifer which is under Sahara) and it does not evaporate.

The underground evaporation of an aquifer can happen, but only when it is close to the surface. In this case a layer of evaporites can form some metres underground (like in the Landes in France, a vast sandy alluvial plain in which we sometimes find horizontal layers of limestone or iron oxyde.)


About the watertable being close to the ground, there are several situations on Earth where this can happen, so it is seldom at random. -An alluvial plain is gained over the ocean -coral growth fills the ocean -a hollow into impermeable rock is filled with alluvions, peat, diatomite... at a pinch, if oceans were rare on Earth, they could exist only as a watertable just under a sediment plain.


To have a Titanian watertable jut some metres bellow a vast mud flat would indicate that a process is working on Titan to fill the methane ocean. Some ideas:

-chemical compounds would crystallise into the methane ocean, filling it in a similar way to coral reefs.
-Eventually this process would involve the methane itself in a crystal building, similar to the chlathrates on Earth which can form solid compounds with methane and water. Anyway both water ice and methane are very common on Titan, so that we can imagine that there would be a layer of frozen chlathrates in place of a liquid ocean.
-a "cryolife" feeding from energetic airborne chemicals would do the same.
-the whole things we see on Titan would be rafts floating on a huge methane ocean. Explaining the overall flatness.


After all, the simplest idea is that, in place of a huge methane ocean, water would make freeze it into chlatrates, as much as pectine can turn syrup into jelly, forming, not a mud flat, but an ice shield.
Eventualy this chlatrate layer would be soaked with liquid methane, or this methane would be recirculated by thermalism.


To test this idea, we even not need to go on Titan. There are on Earth many liquid methane oceans, industrial Titan simulators: all the oil industry when it deals with liquid methane in pipe lines, tankers, etc. We could ask the methane guies what happens when there is water falling into their methane. I am sure they will reply angryly with this. Water into methane will freeze, or course, but it may eventually form chlatrates, even at the very cold temperature of liquid methane.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Palomar   Shoreline On Titan: Best Evidence Yet   Sep 17 2005, 12:28 PM
- - David   How does this square with previous assertions that...   Sep 17 2005, 01:09 PM
- - 4th rock from the sun   The liquids aren't there now, but they were pr...   Sep 17 2005, 02:37 PM
- - Jyril   Dark area on the radar image suggests the ground m...   Sep 17 2005, 05:19 PM
|- - Cugel   QUOTE (Jyril @ Sep 17 2005, 05:19 PM)Also, ra...   Sep 18 2005, 12:20 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   The solution to the apparent contradiction seems t...   Sep 17 2005, 07:00 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Sep 17 2005, 12:00 PM)Th...   Sep 18 2005, 06:22 AM
|- - imran   QUOTE (JRehling @ Sep 18 2005, 06:22 AM)The t...   Sep 18 2005, 06:58 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   A strong argument in favour of rare but heavy rain...   Sep 18 2005, 07:17 AM
|- - DFinfrock   [COLOR=blue]As Bruce MoomMaw wrote in Post #10: ...   Sep 20 2005, 02:34 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (DFinfrock @ Sep 20 2005, 02:34 AM)This...   Sep 20 2005, 07:13 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   The picture which is now forming pretty clearly of...   Sep 18 2005, 10:31 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   I've just found an article by Lorenz in the Ja...   Sep 18 2005, 10:43 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   Now, I HAVE found a clear reference to the fact th...   Sep 18 2005, 10:50 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   Thanks BruceMoomaw for the interesting discution a...   Sep 18 2005, 07:38 PM
- - scalbers   Haven't had a chance to do this yet with these...   Sep 18 2005, 04:33 PM
- - David   I don't really know that much about the scienc...   Sep 18 2005, 05:43 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (David @ Sep 18 2005, 05:43 PM)I don...   Sep 18 2005, 07:08 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Sep 18 2005, 08:08 P...   Sep 18 2005, 07:39 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Sep 18 2005, 07:39 PM)Richa...   Sep 18 2005, 08:04 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   David: Nobody is saying that the methane rain that...   Sep 18 2005, 10:22 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Sep 18 2005, 10:22 PM)Bu...   Sep 20 2005, 07:32 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   Yes, but in those situations water seeps into the ...   Sep 20 2005, 11:31 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Sep 20 2005, 11:31 AM)Ye...   Sep 20 2005, 01:10 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Actually, I believe you're right -- on thinkin...   Sep 20 2005, 03:05 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Sep 20 2005, 08:05 AM)Bu...   Sep 20 2005, 04:37 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (JRehling @ Sep 20 2005, 05:37 PM)Assum...   Sep 20 2005, 04:48 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Note also that one of the most recent Cassini rada...   Sep 20 2005, 03:12 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Robert Mitchell has recently told me flatly that i...   Sep 20 2005, 05:19 PM
- - exoplanet   Has anyone put forward a theory that some sort of ...   Sep 20 2005, 06:43 PM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (exoplanet @ Sep 20 2005, 11:43 AM)... ...   Nov 1 2005, 04:59 PM
|- - imran   Just an article I found interesting. Rivers on Ti...   Dec 6 2005, 06:29 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (imran @ Dec 6 2005, 06:29 AM)Just an a...   Dec 6 2005, 07:22 AM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 5 2005, 11:22 PM...   Dec 7 2005, 10:03 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 7 2005, 10:03 AM)I thin...   Dec 8 2005, 08:38 AM
|- - ljk4-1   The lighting levels are about right, supposedly Hu...   Feb 17 2006, 03:21 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 8 2005, 12:3...   Feb 17 2006, 05:31 PM
|- - stevesliva   From what elevation is that? Is the convex appear...   Feb 20 2006, 08:31 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Not necessarily. First, the only spring channels ...   Sep 20 2005, 11:52 PM
- - exoplanet   Dear Bruce, I honestly respect you opinion but I ...   Sep 21 2005, 02:58 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   "Titan rain should not have much force as it ...   Sep 21 2005, 03:52 AM
- - exoplanet   "Bar-Nun's lab simulations had indicated ...   Sep 21 2005, 04:36 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   In chronological order: (2001) http://copernicus...   Sep 21 2005, 11:41 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   It isn't that the dark stuff falls out of the ...   Dec 7 2005, 07:47 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Dec 7 2005, 07:47 AM)It ...   Dec 7 2005, 08:45 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 7 2005, 08:45 AM...   Dec 7 2005, 02:02 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   From Ralph Lorenz's very short abstract ...   Mar 27 2006, 06:24 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th June 2024 - 02:57 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.