PFS issue on Venus Express, PFS scanner stuck in its closed position |
PFS issue on Venus Express, PFS scanner stuck in its closed position |
Jun 2 2006, 02:54 AM
Post
#76
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
|
|
|
Jun 5 2006, 02:37 PM
Post
#77
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
If someone could clarify for me: What could be done from Earth
to make up for the PFS? -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Guest_DonPMitchell_* |
Jun 5 2006, 08:06 PM
Post
#78
|
Guests |
If someone could clarify for me: What could be done from Earth to make up for the PFS? I think they were hoping to correlate PFS read readings with cloud pictures, to get a better idea of what the mysterious UV-darkening substance is, and also perhaps why the cold collar is different (it appears to be a higher-altitude white haze layer). That's not easy from Earth. In general, the confusion of the Earth's atmosphere has made precise spectroscopy of other planets very difficult. In the case of Venus, there were decades of different scientists publishing, "There's water", "No there isn't", "Yes there is, and we see oxygen too!", "I don't!"... |
|
|
Jun 5 2006, 08:09 PM
Post
#79
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
I think they were hoping to correlate PFS read readings with cloud pictures, to get a better idea of what the mysterious UV-darkening substance is, and also perhaps why the cold collar is different (it appears to be a higher-altitude white haze layer). That's not easy from Earth. In general, the confusion of the Earth's atmosphere has made precise spectroscopy of other planets very difficult. In the case of Venus, there were decades of different scientists publishing, "There's water", "No there isn't", "Yes there is, and we see oxygen too!", "I don't!"... Hmm... how about a telescope in Earth orbit that could examine Venus for those features? -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Jun 5 2006, 08:31 PM
Post
#80
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
Hmm... how about a telescope in Earth orbit that could examine Venus for those features? I think the problem is the high spatial resolution that's desired. Imaging spectrometers (like VIMS on Cassini) need to be up-close to get the spatial resolution. If you're summing over a big parcel of the cloudtop area, you don't find out what distinguishes the darker clouds from the lighter ones. It seems to me that Messenger, of all unexpected calvaries, should actually perform some pretty significant science in this regard, but it's a one-flyby shot. But assuming the weather patterns on Venus tend to be similar from one month to the next (shouldn't be any seasons at all), one snapshot in time might be 80% as good as the same thing repeated for a year of orbiter data. |
|
|
Guest_DonPMitchell_* |
Jun 5 2006, 09:27 PM
Post
#81
|
Guests |
FYI, here is the hubble photo of Venus. I dug up the original image, because I wanted to see what was really there before someone produced the ugly purple-colored over-sharpened image that gets published all the time:
[attachment=6082:attachment] This is enlarged 4 times with a windowed sinc filter, and it's taken with a UV filter. |
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 01:29 PM
Post
#82
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 624 Joined: 10-August 05 Member No.: 460 |
Notta about the PFS in the latest ESA press release. No news is good news?
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 01:34 PM
Post
#83
|
|
Special Cookie Group: Members Posts: 2168 Joined: 6-April 05 From: Sintra | Portugal Member No.: 228 |
Notta about the PFS in the latest ESA press release. No news is good news? "PFS - The instrument is currently OFF and is not included in the routine planning. Any further attempt to move the scanner is now suspended until further notice." Here you have more regular updates on the operations. Link edited -------------------- "Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe |
|
|
Jul 21 2006, 03:05 PM
Post
#84
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 370 Joined: 12-September 05 From: France Member No.: 495 |
Current planning does not forsee any PFS testing until early end September/early October 2006.
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/in...fobjectid=39710 |
|
|
Jul 24 2006, 03:57 AM
Post
#85
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 171 Joined: 17-March 06 Member No.: 709 |
I have it, from a Brilliant Reliable Unmanned Craft Expert, that the PFS on Venus Express may still be "cured." Since ESA tests indicate that warming the PFS up seems to help, they may be considering the possibilities of a more intense thermal shock. This would mean exposing that side of VEX to the Sun in a major way to heat up the PFS a lot more, but doing careful studies to make sure that they won't damage the other instruments in the process, and also making a lot of high-priority science observations with them before risking this type of maneuver. They may also try cycling it between strong heat and strong cold. Sometimes such thermal shock works, as with MARSIS' antenna, and sometimes it doesn't, as with the forward plasma-analyzer door on Mariner 10. The other option would be to try to include a replacement on Japan's Venus probe. Another Phil |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Sep 7 2006, 10:29 PM
Post
#86
|
Guests |
PFS is still off according to the latest VEx update.
BTW, VEx will be the subject of a special issue of an upcoming issue of Planetary and Space Science. I don't think these will be science results, but rather pre-launch science papers. |
|
|
Sep 7 2006, 11:14 PM
Post
#87
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
Messenger will fly by Venus in six weeks. Does anyone have any information about possible coordinated observations?
|
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Sep 7 2006, 11:19 PM
Post
#88
|
Guests |
Messenger will fly by Venus in six weeks. Does anyone have any information about possible coordinated observations? I think I mentioned something about this late last year. |
|
|
Sep 8 2006, 01:54 AM
Post
#89
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
I think I mentioned something about this late last year. Right -- I simply misplaced in my memory which encounter would be the "blind" one and which one would be the science one. Delayed gratification again... |
|
|
Sep 18 2006, 08:09 PM
Post
#90
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1585 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
They may also try cycling it between strong heat and strong cold. Sometimes such thermal shock works, as with MARSIS' antenna, and sometimes it doesn't, as with the forward plasma-analyzer door on Mariner 10. It worked with the Stardust navcam, after outgassing contaminated the lens. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th June 2024 - 04:59 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |